Cheirosa 62 vs Cheirosa 40
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances
Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a toasty, slightly sweet pistachio that leans more dessert than nut, quickly pulling salted caramel into the heart where the two lock together in a warm, buttery accord. Jasmine hums underneath — present but polite, softening the gourmand edge without going floral. The dry-down settles into vanilla and sandalwood that feel close to skin rather than loud, leaving a creamy, lightly woody finish with good longevity but modest sillage. — Best in cool weather, layered under outerwear, for anyone who wants comfort-food warmth without crossing into cloying territory.
Opens with a ripe, almost bruised plum that softens quickly as jasmine moves in — not sharp or soapy, but warm and slightly creamy. The heart settles into a jasmine-plum accord that leans sweet without turning candied, held together by sandalwood that adds a dry, woody undercurrent. Vanilla anchors the dry-down, pulling the whole thing toward skin-close comfort rather than loud sillage — projection is moderate at best, intimate by the second hour. Longevity is decent but not remarkable. — Best worn in cooler months layered on skin or hair; a reliable everyday feminine for someone who wants soft sweetness without going full gourmand.
How they overlap
Cheirosa 62 and Cheirosa 40 share 3 notes (jasmine, sandalwood, vanilla). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (2 unique to Cheirosa 62, 1 unique to Cheirosa 40) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Cheirosa 62 is the cheaper original at $38 compared to $42 for Cheirosa 40 — about 10% less. Cheirosa 40 covers 3 seasons (spring, fall, winter) — wider weather range than Cheirosa 62, which leans fall/winter-only.