Cheirosa 87 vs Cheirosa 40
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright ylang ylang that's more tropical resort than heady floral, quickly softened by coconut milk and a whisper of sea salt that keeps it from going full dessert. The heart settles into a creamy, skin-close white floral blend — airy rather than heavy — while vanilla and white amber nudge the dry-down toward a warm, lightly sweet finish with just enough softness to feel beachy rather than cloying. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate and close-wearing — Made for warm-weather days when you want to smell like sunscreen and salt air without trying too hard.
Opens with a ripe, almost bruised plum that softens quickly as jasmine moves in — not sharp or soapy, but warm and slightly creamy. The heart settles into a jasmine-plum accord that leans sweet without turning candied, held together by sandalwood that adds a dry, woody undercurrent. Vanilla anchors the dry-down, pulling the whole thing toward skin-close comfort rather than loud sillage — projection is moderate at best, intimate by the second hour. Longevity is decent but not remarkable. — Best worn in cooler months layered on skin or hair; a reliable everyday feminine for someone who wants soft sweetness without going full gourmand.
How they overlap
Cheirosa 87 and Cheirosa 40 share exactly one note (vanilla). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Original-bottle pricing is essentially identical ($42 vs $42), so the choice rarely comes down to upfront cost. Cheirosa 87 is built for spring/summer/fall; Cheirosa 40 for spring/fall/winter. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.