Cheirosa 87 vs Cheirosa 62
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright ylang ylang that's more tropical resort than heady floral, quickly softened by coconut milk and a whisper of sea salt that keeps it from going full dessert. The heart settles into a creamy, skin-close white floral blend — airy rather than heavy — while vanilla and white amber nudge the dry-down toward a warm, lightly sweet finish with just enough softness to feel beachy rather than cloying. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate and close-wearing — Made for warm-weather days when you want to smell like sunscreen and salt air without trying too hard.
Opens with a toasty, slightly sweet pistachio that leans more dessert than nut, quickly pulling salted caramel into the heart where the two lock together in a warm, buttery accord. Jasmine hums underneath — present but polite, softening the gourmand edge without going floral. The dry-down settles into vanilla and sandalwood that feel close to skin rather than loud, leaving a creamy, lightly woody finish with good longevity but modest sillage. — Best in cool weather, layered under outerwear, for anyone who wants comfort-food warmth without crossing into cloying territory.
How they overlap
Cheirosa 87 and Cheirosa 62 share exactly one note (vanilla). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Cheirosa 62 is the cheaper original at $38 compared to $42 for Cheirosa 87 — about 10% less. Cheirosa 87 is built for spring/summer/fall; Cheirosa 62 for fall/winter. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.