Sweet Like Candy vs Cloud EDP
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright, slightly tart pear that softens almost immediately into a cloud of marshmallow and praline — the sweetness is thick but rounded, never harsh. Cassis adds a faint dark-fruit depth in the heart, keeping it from going one-dimensional, while jasmine contributes a creamy floral note that blends into the gourmand base rather than standing apart. Dry-down is pure sugared warmth with moderate sillage and close-to-skin projection after a few hours — a cozy skin-scent finish. — Best for cold-weather evenings, casual dates, or anyone who leans into unabashedly sweet, youthful femininity.
Opens with a soft lavender-pear combo that reads more airy than floral — clean and slightly fruity without going sharp. The heart is where it gets interesting: coconut and praline merge into a warm, almost edible sweetness that stops just short of cloying. The dry-down settles into a musky, lightly woody base that anchors the sweetness and gives it some staying power. Projection is moderate, sillage polite rather than loud — a skin-close comfort scent that lingers without announcing itself — Everyday casual wear, spring through fall, best suited to those who want sweetness without full-on dessert.
How they overlap
Sweet Like Candy and Cloud EDP share 2 notes (pear, praline). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (3 unique to Sweet Like Candy, 4 unique to Cloud EDP) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Cloud EDP is the cheaper original at $55 compared to $65 for Sweet Like Candy — about 15% less. Sweet Like Candy is built for fall/winter; Cloud EDP for spring/summer/fall. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.