Wanted vs Chrome
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright, slightly tart citrus burst — lemon and bergamot sharpened by cardamom and juniper berries — that feels clean without being generic. The heart settles into a soft lavender-sage accord that keeps things from going too sweet, while the dry-down leans into tonka bean and vetiver for a warm, slightly powdery woodiness with just enough gourmand pull to stay interesting. Projection is moderate, sillage stays close after a few hours — wearable but not aggressive. — A solid warm-weather office or casual-evening pick for someone who wants to smell put-together without committing to anything heavy.
Opens with a sharp, sunlit burst of lemon and bergamot that feels clean rather than sweet, with rosemary adding a faintly herbal edge that keeps it from reading as a simple citrus splash. The heart settles into cool, slightly astringent tea — the defining note that separates this from generic sport fragrances. Cedar grounds the dry-down without going woody or heavy; musk keeps it skin-close with modest sillage and soft projection that fades gracefully rather than clinging. Undemanding but well-constructed. — Best in warm weather, ideal for office or casual daywear, suits anyone who wants clean and approachable without being boring.
How they overlap
Wanted and Chrome share 2 notes (lemon, bergamot). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (6 unique to Wanted, 4 unique to Chrome) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Chrome is the cheaper original at $80 compared to $95 for Wanted — about 16% less. Wanted covers 3 seasons (spring, summer, fall) — wider weather range than Chrome, which leans spring/summer-only.