Good Girl vs Bad Boy
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with roasted coffee and almond that reads more dessert than floral, pulling sweet and slightly bitter at once. The heart softens into jasmine sambac and tuberose, though neither ever dominates — they're there to round the edges rather than lead. Cocoa and tonka anchor the dry-down into a warm, skin-close finish with real staying power. Sillage is confident without being aggressive; it announces itself on entry and lingers for hours without demanding the room. — Best in cold weather, suited to evenings out or anywhere you want to smell deliberately, unapologetically feminine.
Bergamot and pepper cut through sharply on the opening, then yield quickly to a rich cacao-tonka heart that reads more dark chocolate than candy-sweet. Cedar anchors the dry-down with a dry, slightly smoky woodiness while amber rounds the edges without going soft. Projection is moderate to strong in the first few hours, leaving a warm, gourmand-woody sillage that clings close by evening. The overall effect is polished darkness — sophisticated rather than aggressive — best worn in fall and winter evenings, suited to men who want something confident but not overwhelming.
How they overlap
Good Girl and Bad Boy share exactly one note (tonka bean). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Good Girl is the cheaper original at $105 compared to $110 for Bad Boy — about 5% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit. Heads up: Good Girl is marketed feminine, Bad Boy is marketed masculine — they target different wearers, though plenty of buyers cross those lines.