Blooming Bouquet EDT vs Addict
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright, airy peony that leans pink and slightly candied, softened quickly by magnolia and a whisper of jasmine. The heart is unabashedly feminine and powdery — not dusty or heavy, just clean and smooth. The dry-down settles into white wood and a faint patchouli that adds barely-there depth without going earthy, anchored by a sheer musk. Projection stays close to skin; sillage is polite, almost intimate. Uncomplicated and wearable to the point of invisibility — best for warm-weather days and anyone who wants to smell quietly, effortlessly pretty.
Mandarin and pink pepper crack open with bright, slightly spicy energy before the heart pulls everything inward — jasmine and rose here are lush but not powdery, sitting close to the skin rather than broadcasting. The blackberry adds a ripe, almost jammy quality that keeps it from reading as purely floral. Dry-down is where it earns its reputation: tonka and vanilla merge into a warm, skin-like sweetness with real staying power and a trailing sillage that lingers hours after application. — Best worn fall through early spring, for evenings out or close-contact situations where warmth and subtle sensuality land harder than volume.
How they overlap
Blooming Bouquet EDT and Addict share exactly one note (jasmine). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Blooming Bouquet EDT is the cheaper original at $110 compared to $130 for Addict — about 15% less. Blooming Bouquet EDT is built for spring/summer; Addict for spring/fall/winter. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.