Kyoto vs Fleur de Peau
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances
Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal blast of cypress and hinoki that smells genuinely Japanese — clean wood shavings and damp stone rather than any synthetic sweetness. The heart softens as cedar rounds out the hinoki's bite, and incense adds a thin thread of smoke without ever going heavy or churchy. The dry-down is where it earns its keep: sandalwood and white musk pull everything into a warm, skin-close finish with modest sillage. Projection stays restrained throughout — this wears quietly, close to the body — Autumn and winter, for anyone who wants a meditative, temple-cool woody without drama.
Opens with a bright snap of bergamot and pink pepper before softening quickly into a skin-close iris — powdery but never starchy, lifted by ambrette's soft muskiness. The heart reads as clean, warm flesh rather than a recognizable flower, with sandalwood and cistus adding a faint resinous haze. Dry-down is almost entirely musk and ambergris, intimate in projection and barely-there in sillage. It smells like someone's warm neck, not a bouquet — refined minimalism that rewards closeness over broadcast — Perfect for late spring and early fall wear, ideal for office or quiet social settings where subtlety reads as sophistication.
How they overlap
Kyoto and Fleur de Peau share exactly one note (sandalwood). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Kyoto is the cheaper original at $175 compared to $245 for Fleur de Peau — about 29% less. Kyoto is built for fall/winter; Fleur de Peau for spring/summer/fall. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.