Tempo vs Fleur de Peau
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal edge of birch that cuts through quickly, giving way to a cool, resinous patchouli that never goes sweet or powdery — it stays green and slightly smoky. Myrrh deepens the heart into something churchlike and dry, while white cedar and sandalwood anchor the dry-down in clean, muted warmth. Projection is modest and close to the skin; sillage is a quiet trail rather than a statement. The overall effect is austere, unhurried, and faintly ancient — ideal for cold-weather days when you want something contemplative and unmistakably grown-up.
Opens with a bright snap of bergamot and pink pepper before softening quickly into a skin-close iris — powdery but never starchy, lifted by ambrette's soft muskiness. The heart reads as clean, warm flesh rather than a recognizable flower, with sandalwood and cistus adding a faint resinous haze. Dry-down is almost entirely musk and ambergris, intimate in projection and barely-there in sillage. It smells like someone's warm neck, not a bouquet — refined minimalism that rewards closeness over broadcast — Perfect for late spring and early fall wear, ideal for office or quiet social settings where subtlety reads as sophistication.
How they overlap
Tempo and Fleur de Peau share exactly one note (sandalwood). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Tempo is the cheaper original at $175 compared to $245 for Fleur de Peau — about 29% less. Tempo is built for fall/winter; Fleur de Peau for spring/summer/fall. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.