Noir Epices vs Portrait of a Lady
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal blast of saffron and clove that smells genuinely dark — not cozy-spiced, but austere and slightly unsettling. The cinnamon and orange soften the heart without sweetening it, keeping everything dry and controlled. Rose appears as shadow rather than flower, barely detectable beneath the spice. The dry-down settles into a sandalwood and musk base with real warmth and moderate, lasting sillage — intimate but persistent. Projection is quiet by the third hour, which suits it — Noir Epices rewards closeness. — Best worn in cold weather by anyone who wants spice without comfort.
Opens with a burst of raspberry and blackcurrant that reads almost jammy before the turkish rose climbs in and takes over — full, dark, and slightly powdery rather than fresh-cut. The heart is where this earns its reputation: rose and patchouli lock together into something dense and resinous, more incense than floral. The dry-down softens into sandalwood and musk with strong sillage that lingers for hours without screaming. Projection is assertive but controlled, a fragrance that announces itself without apology — cold-weather evenings, formal occasions, anyone who wants to fill a room.
How they overlap
Noir Epices and Portrait of a Lady share 2 notes (sandalwood, musk). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (5 unique to Noir Epices, 4 unique to Portrait of a Lady) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Noir Epices is the cheaper original at $310 compared to $335 for Portrait of a Lady — about 7% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.