Labdanum 18 vs Santal 33
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with the resinous, almost medicinal depth of labdanum and cistus — raw, slightly animalic, like sun-warmed stone soaked in amber. The heart softens that roughness without losing it, ambergris lending a marine-mineral quality that keeps things from going purely sweet. Benzoin eases the dry-down into something warmer and rounder, while musk anchors it close to skin. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate rather than commanding. What it leaves behind is a dense, skin-like warmth that reads as genuinely expensive — Cold-weather wear for someone who wants depth over spectacle.
Cardamom and violet open with a cool, almost smoky spice before sandalwood and cedar move in and take over the heart — smooth, dry, slightly milky wood with an iris edge that adds a powdery chalk note without going feminine. Leather stays low and clean throughout, never harsh, grounding everything into a skin-close dry-down that projects modestly but leaves a persistent, intimate sillage. It wears like worn wood and clean skin, not loud but oddly hard to ignore — fall and winter, for anyone who wants a unisex signature that reads as effortlessly considered.
How they overlap
Labdanum 18 and Santal 33 share no notes in common — these two fragrances target very different olfactory territory, and the comparison is a question of which direction you want to go rather than which version of the same accord.
The buying decision
Labdanum 18 is the cheaper original at $198 compared to $245 for Santal 33 — about 19% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.
Recommendation
These two land in genuinely different scent territory — there's no "better" answer, just which direction you want to go. Read the scent descriptions above and pick the one that sounds like you'd want to smell.