Cheirosa 62 vs Cheirosa 87
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a toasty, slightly sweet pistachio that leans more dessert than nut, quickly pulling salted caramel into the heart where the two lock together in a warm, buttery accord. Jasmine hums underneath — present but polite, softening the gourmand edge without going floral. The dry-down settles into vanilla and sandalwood that feel close to skin rather than loud, leaving a creamy, lightly woody finish with good longevity but modest sillage. — Best in cool weather, layered under outerwear, for anyone who wants comfort-food warmth without crossing into cloying territory.
Opens with a bright ylang ylang that's more tropical resort than heady floral, quickly softened by coconut milk and a whisper of sea salt that keeps it from going full dessert. The heart settles into a creamy, skin-close white floral blend — airy rather than heavy — while vanilla and white amber nudge the dry-down toward a warm, lightly sweet finish with just enough softness to feel beachy rather than cloying. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate and close-wearing — Made for warm-weather days when you want to smell like sunscreen and salt air without trying too hard.
How they overlap
Cheirosa 62 and Cheirosa 87 share exactly one note (vanilla). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Cheirosa 62 is the cheaper original at $38 compared to $42 for Cheirosa 87 — about 10% less. Cheirosa 62 is built for fall/winter; Cheirosa 87 for spring/summer/fall. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.