Cheirosa 87 vs Cheirosa 59
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright ylang ylang that's more tropical resort than heady floral, quickly softened by coconut milk and a whisper of sea salt that keeps it from going full dessert. The heart settles into a creamy, skin-close white floral blend — airy rather than heavy — while vanilla and white amber nudge the dry-down toward a warm, lightly sweet finish with just enough softness to feel beachy rather than cloying. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate and close-wearing — Made for warm-weather days when you want to smell like sunscreen and salt air without trying too hard.
Opens with a lightly roasted pistachio that reads more nutty-sweet than green, landing quickly into a thick salted caramel heart that keeps the sweetness honest rather than cloying. Vanilla and tonka bean merge seamlessly in the dry-down, pulling things warmer and slightly powdery, while sandalwood adds just enough creaminess to ground it without going full woodsy. Musk keeps the sillage close — this wears like a skin scent with quiet but persistent projection. — Best for cool-weather evenings, cozy layering, or anyone who wants gourmand sweetness that reads grown-up rather than candy-aisle.
How they overlap
Cheirosa 87 and Cheirosa 59 share exactly one note (vanilla). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Cheirosa 59 is the cheaper original at $38 compared to $42 for Cheirosa 87 — about 10% less. Cheirosa 87 is built for spring/summer/fall; Cheirosa 59 for fall/winter. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.