MYSLF vs Y
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright citrus burst of bergamot and mandarin that feels clean and slightly fizzy, softened almost immediately by a creamy orange blossom heart that keeps things from going too sharp. As it settles, cedar adds quiet structure while vetiver grounds it with a subtle earthiness that stops the florals from going feminine. The dry-down is smooth musk — skin-close, warm, and easy. Projection is moderate; sillage is polite rather than demanding, making it genuinely wearable without effort — a versatile warm-weather daily wear for men who want something presentable but not boring.
Ginger and cardamom arrive sharp and slightly medicinal in the opening, cutting through any sweetness before the ambroxan takes over — and it really takes over. The heart settles into that mineral-clean, skin-amplifying ambroxan signature backed by dry cedarwood and a whisper of iris, giving it a polished, almost soapy quality. Vanilla keeps the dry-down from going austere, adding just enough warmth to round out the vetiver's earthiness. Projection is confident without being aggressive; sillage lingers close to skin after a few hours — a versatile year-round office and date-night fragrance for someone who wants clean masculinity with actual depth.
How they overlap
MYSLF and Y share exactly one note (vetiver). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Y is the cheaper original at $110 compared to $130 for MYSLF — about 15% less.