Y vs MYSLF Eau de Parfum
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Ginger and cardamom arrive sharp and slightly medicinal in the opening, cutting through any sweetness before the ambroxan takes over — and it really takes over. The heart settles into that mineral-clean, skin-amplifying ambroxan signature backed by dry cedarwood and a whisper of iris, giving it a polished, almost soapy quality. Vanilla keeps the dry-down from going austere, adding just enough warmth to round out the vetiver's earthiness. Projection is confident without being aggressive; sillage lingers close to skin after a few hours — a versatile year-round office and date-night fragrance for someone who wants clean masculinity with actual depth.
Cardamom leads sharp and spiced in the opening, cutting through quickly before iris takes over — cool, powdery, and slightly rooty in the heart. Leather adds a dry edge that keeps it from going too sweet, while sandalwood and amber ease it into a warm, skin-close base. Vanilla in the dry-down is restrained rather than gourmand, rounding things out without turning cloying. Projection is moderate, sillage intimate — this wears closer to the skin than it announces itself. — Best in cooler months for evening wear or professional settings where something warm but polished reads well.
How they overlap
Y and MYSLF Eau de Parfum share 3 notes (cardamom, iris, vanilla). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (4 unique to Y, 3 unique to MYSLF Eau de Parfum) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Y is the cheaper original at $110 compared to $140 for MYSLF Eau de Parfum — about 21% less.