Labdanum 18 vs Rose 31
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with the resinous, almost medicinal depth of labdanum and cistus — raw, slightly animalic, like sun-warmed stone soaked in amber. The heart softens that roughness without losing it, ambergris lending a marine-mineral quality that keeps things from going purely sweet. Benzoin eases the dry-down into something warmer and rounder, while musk anchors it close to skin. Projection is moderate; sillage is intimate rather than commanding. What it leaves behind is a dense, skin-like warmth that reads as genuinely expensive — Cold-weather wear for someone who wants depth over spectacle.
Opens with a sharp, almost savory bite of cumin riding over rose, making it smell more like skin than a flower arrangement — intentional, unsettling, effective. The heart settles into a smoky cedar that pushes the rose into the background, keeping it present but never pretty. Amber and musk anchor the dry-down into something dense and body-warm, with moderate projection that stays close to the skin and leaves a woody, slightly animalic sillage. — Best in cold weather on someone who wants a rose that refuses to be delicate.
How they overlap
Labdanum 18 and Rose 31 share exactly one note (musk). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Labdanum 18 is the cheaper original at $198 compared to $245 for Rose 31 — about 19% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.