Carlisle vs Percival
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bright, slightly tart apple cut through by snappy ginger and pink pepper — enough spice to keep it from reading sweet. The heart settles into a rose-forward floral warmed by cinnamon, jasmine adding softness without going powdery. Patchouli and benzoin anchor the dry-down into something resinous and skin-close, with moderate sillage that leans intimate rather than room-filling. Projection is confident in the first few hours, then retreats to a quiet, warm trail — apple and spice long gone, patchouli doing the heavy lifting. — A fall and winter fragrance for anyone who wants a polished, approachable oriental without tipping into excess sweetness.
Opens with a clean bergamot-lavender accord that reads more groomed than sharp, softening almost immediately as iris steps in and pulls things in a powdery, slightly rooty direction. The heart is where it earns its reputation — iris and violet create a cool, slightly dusty floral that feels genuinely wearable rather than decorative, with rose hovering in the background adding faint warmth. Dry-down settles into sandalwood and ambrette musk: smooth, skin-close, quietly sensual. Projection is moderate; sillage is a polite trail rather than a statement. — A refined daily wear for cooler spring and fall days, suits anyone who wants understated sophistication without reading overtly feminine or masculine.
How they overlap
Carlisle and Percival share exactly one note (rose). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Percival is the cheaper original at $325 compared to $385 for Carlisle — about 16% less. Carlisle is built for fall/winter; Percival for spring/summer/fall. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.