Oud Ispahan vs Addict
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a bold, resinous rose doused in smoky oud — rich and almost medicinal in the first minutes, then settling into a dense floral-wood heart where the two notes lock together seamlessly. Amber deepens the base while sandalwood softens the oud's edge, and patchouli adds a faint earthiness beneath. Incense threads through the dry-down, keeping things ceremonial rather than sweet. Projection is substantial; sillage lingers long after you leave a room. Musk anchors the whole structure without going soft — this stays dark, serious, and deliberate throughout — Best worn in cold weather or evening settings by anyone who wants fragrance to make a statement before they do.
Mandarin and pink pepper crack open with bright, slightly spicy energy before the heart pulls everything inward — jasmine and rose here are lush but not powdery, sitting close to the skin rather than broadcasting. The blackberry adds a ripe, almost jammy quality that keeps it from reading as purely floral. Dry-down is where it earns its reputation: tonka and vanilla merge into a warm, skin-like sweetness with real staying power and a trailing sillage that lingers hours after application. — Best worn fall through early spring, for evenings out or close-contact situations where warmth and subtle sensuality land harder than volume.
How they overlap
Oud Ispahan and Addict share exactly one note (rose). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Addict is the cheaper original at $130 compared to $310 for Oud Ispahan — about 58% less.
Recommendation
If you're price-sensitive, Addict delivers comparable territory at $180 less than Oud Ispahan. If you want the specific character of Oud Ispahan — the prose above is the better guide than the price — the premium is what you're paying for.