1804 vs Baccarat Rouge 540
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances
1804

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal oud that settles quickly into a dense, resinous core where agarwood and amber fuse into something thick and animalic. The leather emerges in the heart — dry and slightly smoky, grounded by spices that add warmth without sharpness. Projection is moderate and intentional; it doesn't announce itself across a room but holds close with serious sillage. The dry-down is where it earns its keep: a musky, woody residue that lingers for hours — Best worn in cold weather by someone who wants to smell expensive and deliberately unapproachable.
Saffron opens sharp and slightly medicinal, then almost immediately dissolves into a warm, luminous blur of jasmine and amberwood — the signature move that made this famous. The heart is less floral than it sounds; the jasmine reads more as a sweetened airiness than a recognizable bloom. Dry-down is where it lives: cedar and fir resin ground a soft, skin-close amber that radiates rather than announces itself, with sillage that lingers in a room long after you've left — Fall and winter wearing, for anyone who wants to smell expensive without being loud about it.
How they overlap
1804 and Baccarat Rouge 540 share no notes in common — these two fragrances target very different olfactory territory, and the comparison is a question of which direction you want to go rather than which version of the same accord.
The buying decision
1804 is the cheaper original at $145 compared to $325 for Baccarat Rouge 540 — about 55% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.
Recommendation
If you're price-sensitive, 1804 delivers comparable territory at $180 less than Baccarat Rouge 540. If you want the specific character of Baccarat Rouge 540 — the prose above is the better guide than the price — the premium is what you're paying for.