1804 vs Sauvage EDP
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances
1804

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal oud that settles quickly into a dense, resinous core where agarwood and amber fuse into something thick and animalic. The leather emerges in the heart — dry and slightly smoky, grounded by spices that add warmth without sharpness. Projection is moderate and intentional; it doesn't announce itself across a room but holds close with serious sillage. The dry-down is where it earns its keep: a musky, woody residue that lingers for hours — Best worn in cold weather by someone who wants to smell expensive and deliberately unapproachable.
Opens with a sharp bergamot-and-pink-pepper blast that has a near-electric quality — clean but with real bite. The lavender arrives quickly in the heart, smoother than expected, softening the pepper without dulling it. Sichuan pepper keeps a faint tingle alive through the mid-stage. The dry-down is where it earns its reputation: amberwood and vanilla pull it into warm, skin-close territory, projection tightening from loud to a confident personal cloud. Sillage trails long and distinctively. — Cool-weather daily wear for someone who wants presence without effort.
How they overlap
1804 and Sauvage EDP share no notes in common — these two fragrances target very different olfactory territory, and the comparison is a question of which direction you want to go rather than which version of the same accord.
The buying decision
1804 is the cheaper original at $145 compared to $155 for Sauvage EDP — about 6% less. Sauvage EDP covers 3 seasons (spring, fall, winter) — wider weather range than 1804, which leans fall/winter-only.
Recommendation
These two land in genuinely different scent territory — there's no "better" answer, just which direction you want to go. Read the scent descriptions above and pick the one that sounds like you'd want to smell.