Pacific Chill vs Symphony
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp citrus burst — lemon and orange cut clean, brightened immediately by cool mint that keeps everything from reading as simple fruit. Blackcurrant pulls it slightly dark in the heart, while coriander and basil add an herbal edge that stops it from going sweet. Rose sits quietly underneath without announcing itself; fig rounds the dry-down into something soft and slightly creamy. Projection is moderate, sillage polite — this stays close by afternoon. — Best worn spring through summer, ideal for anyone who wants fresh without smelling like a generic sport fragrance.
The opening is cool and powdery, iris and aldehydes hitting together with that slightly soapy, almost metallic lift that classic aldehydic florals are known for — refined rather than sharp. Rose steps in to soften the heart without turning sweet, keeping things restrained and slightly abstract. The dry-down is where it earns its price: sandalwood and amber build a warm, skin-close base that holds the powder without turning gourmand, while musk keeps sillage intimate and long-lasting. Projection is moderate — it announces, doesn't broadcast — best worn in cooler months by anyone who wants something quiet and genuinely elegant, whether in a boardroom or a winter coat.
How they overlap
Pacific Chill and Symphony share exactly one note (rose). The overlap is real but narrow — most of the wear experience will diverge.
The buying decision
Symphony is the cheaper original at $360 compared to $450 for Pacific Chill — about 20% less. Pacific Chill is built for spring/summer; Symphony for spring/fall/winter. Pick by when you'd actually wear it.
Free: The 30 Best-Tested Dupes Under $40
A community-scored cheat sheet you can download now — 30 designer scents matched for under $40, ranked by accuracy and longevity.