Scandal Pour Homme vs Aoud
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Bergamot and mandarin open with a bright citrus snap that barely lingers before cinnamon and jasmine pull it into warm, spiced floral territory. The heart is dense but not heavy — rose and leather interlock cleanly, giving it a polished animal edge rather than a raw one. The dry-down is where it earns its price: labdanum, ambergris, and sandalwood settle into a deep, resinous amber with quiet musk underneath, projecting moderately but leaving a rich, skin-close sillage that lasts for hours — best worn on cold nights when you want to be remembered after you've left the room.
Opens with a dense, almost medicinal saffron-stained rose — vivid and slightly animalic before the oud anchors everything into dark, resinous territory. The heart is where it earns its price: rose and oud locked together in a smoky, leathery embrace that reads as genuinely opulent rather than synthetic. The dry-down softens through sandalwood and amber into a warm, skin-close finish with long-lasting sillage that still announces itself hours in — projection is bold for the first two to three hours, then intimate. — Cold-weather evenings, formal occasions, anyone who wears fragrance as a statement rather than an afterthought.
How they overlap
Scandal Pour Homme and Aoud share 3 notes (rose, sandalwood, leather). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (7 unique to Scandal Pour Homme, 3 unique to Aoud) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Aoud is the cheaper original at $560 compared to $595 for Scandal Pour Homme — about 6% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.