F***ing Fabulous vs Cherry Smoke
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, almost medicinal lavender cut through with bitter almond — sweet but never edible. Within minutes, the leather moves in and owns the composition: dry, smoky, and slightly animalic rather than polished or saddle-like. Clary sage adds an herbal edge that keeps the leather from going soft. The dry-down is where tonka and amber arrive, softening the whole thing into a warm, skin-close haze with just enough sweetness to feel luxurious. Projection is bold in the first hour, then retreats into a tight, intimate sillage — — Fall evenings out, confident wear for anyone who leans into darkness over sweetness.
Opens with a dark, almost bruised cherry — fruit that reads more fermented than fresh — immediately threaded with dry smoke and bitter leather. The heart deepens as oud and amber push the sweetness into resinous, slightly medicinal territory, keeping the gourmand angle from tipping saccharine. The dry-down is where it earns its price: vanilla and musk soften the edges into a warm, smoldering skin-close haze with moderate sillage that lingers for hours without announcing itself to the room — Cold-weather evenings, date nights, anyone who wants gourmand without smelling like dessert.
How they overlap
F***ing Fabulous and Cherry Smoke share 2 notes (leather, amber). The same note name doesn't always mean the same scent — different houses use different vanillas, different woods, different musks — but a multi-note shared spine usually does indicate genuinely-comparable wear character. The remaining notes (4 unique to F***ing Fabulous, 5 unique to Cherry Smoke) are where the divergence happens.
The buying decision
Cherry Smoke is the cheaper original at $370 compared to $395 for F***ing Fabulous — about 6% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.