Richwood vs Alexandria II
Side by side. Scored honestly.
← Compare different fragrances

Side by side
Comparing the originals — price, breadth, listed-note depth.
Opens with a sharp, resinous oud that leans dry rather than barnyard, cut immediately by cedar that keeps the whole thing from turning murky. The heart settles into a leather-and-sandalwood core — smooth but with real weight, amber adding a slow warmth underneath. Projection is moderate and deliberate; this doesn't announce itself across a room, but the sillage lingers close and rich for hours. The dry-down is almost purely musk and amber, quietly luxurious — A cold-weather fragrance for someone who wants depth without spectacle.
Honey and rose open together in a thick, almost syrupy accord — warmer and more resinous than floral — before lavender pulls things briefly cooler in the heart. It settles quickly into labdanum and patchouli, which anchor the whole thing in a dark, earthy sweetness that vanilla softens without making cloying. Projection is confident but not aggressive; sillage trails rich and close-worn by the dry-down, leaving a skin-warm amber-honey base that lingers for hours — fall and winter evenings, for anyone who wants to smell expensive without smelling loud.
How they overlap
Richwood and Alexandria II share no notes in common — these two fragrances target very different olfactory territory, and the comparison is a question of which direction you want to go rather than which version of the same accord.
The buying decision
Richwood is the cheaper original at $450 compared to $540 for Alexandria II — about 17% less. Both wear best across the same fall/winter — they're interchangeable on weather fit.
Recommendation
These two land in genuinely different scent territory — there's no "better" answer, just which direction you want to go. Read the scent descriptions above and pick the one that sounds like you'd want to smell.